RSKTV Player Pro is a media player. It does not provide, host, resell or suggest any content: no channels, no films, no content subscription. Playlists and access credentials are added by the user, who is solely and entirely responsible for them.
1. What this policy covers
It sets out how the publisher handles a report of copyright infringement connected with use of the player, and what follows where the same user is the subject of several substantiated reports. It complements article 9 of the legal notice and article 12 of the terms and conditions.
The scope is precise, and that must be said plainly: the publisher supplies, hosts and recommends no content, and hosts no stream — it therefore cannot take down content that is not on its systems. Its server does, however, keep, device by device and for display purposes only, the list of titles of the playlist registered on it. It can therefore identify a reported stream, withdraw access to it on the device concerned, and act on the licence.
2. Sending a report
Reports go to the contact address given in the legal notice. To be handled, a report must contain:
- the identity and contact details of the rights holder or their agent, and the capacity in which they act;
- identification of the work or right relied on;
- the details identifying the disputed use — in particular the device identifier or the source at issue, failing which the publisher has no way of connecting the report to a licence;
- a good-faith statement that the reported use is not authorised;
- a statement that the information supplied is accurate.
An incomplete report is returned to its sender with an indication of what is missing. A manifestly abusive report is not handled, and the publisher reserves the right to draw the consequences.
3. Handling
The publisher acknowledges receipt within a reasonable time, checks that the report is complete and that the reporter establishes their capacity, then assesses the material produced. It is neither judge nor arbiter of copyright: it records what is duly notified to it.
Where the report is substantiated and connected to an identified licence, the publisher warns the user and may suspend the licence, on the terms of article 12 of the terms and conditions.
4. Repeat infringement
A user who is the subject of repeated substantiated reports has their licence treated as follows:
- First substantiated report — written warning, reminder of the obligations in article 8 of the terms, and removal of the source at issue at the user's own initiative.
- Second substantiated report — suspension of the licence pending regularisation.
- Third substantiated report — final termination of the licence, without refund, in accordance with article 12 of the terms.
This progression is not mechanical. The publisher takes account of how serious the facts are, whether they were deliberate, and how much time has passed: reports years apart are not treated as repetition. Conversely, manifest and large-scale infringement may justify immediate termination without the earlier steps.
Termination on this ground concerns the licence, not the person: it does not bar the later purchase of a new licence, save in cases of serious and repeated infringement.
5. Challenging a measure
A user whose licence is suspended or terminated is informed and may challenge the measure at the same contact address, setting out the rights they hold in the source at issue. The publisher re-examines the file and restores the licence where the challenge is well-founded.
6. Record
The publisher records the reports received, the checks carried out and the measures taken. That record is internal; it may be produced to a competent authority or to a court.
Personal information it contains is processed in accordance with the privacy policy.